Yes, that was a mis-statement as I was thinking 'full-frame' fisheye.
Still, I suspect that the 16mm full frame fisheye does not give true 'equal
area' proportion as does the 8mm circular fisheye.
Chip Stratton
cstrat@xxxxxxxxx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of ZuikoholicRI@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 1:04 PM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] WA corner distortion?
>
>
> In a message dated 10/11/2000 10:47:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> cstrat@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> > Does the 16mm Zuiko rectilinear fisheye preserve area, or is it
> somewhere in
> > between pure area and angle preservation?
>
> I think the terms "rectilinear" and "fisheye" are mutually exclusive. The
> Zuiko 16mm is a full-frame fisheye, but it's still a fisheye like
> the 8mm. It
> just has a 43mm image circle instead of a 23mm image circle. I
> wonder if you
> could use it as a full-frame fisheye on a medium-format camera? Probably
> couldn't get it to infinity focus, I presume.
>
> Paul Schings
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|