You're really testing our collective ability to reason, Ray. Let's see...
Cindy Crawford, Elle McPherson, ...
Ooops, wrong context 8^0
Having a smattering of bodies, I truthfully have scarcely touched any of my
others since acquiring a 4-T (actually, just got my second one last month).
I love my 1 for it's simplicity and elementary elegance. My 2n became my
regular user until the 4-Ts came along, I have a G that I ostensibly got my
wife to use (yea, sure), and a 40 (PC) that I picked up for the lens that
was attached to it. Love them all for differing reasons, but practically
speaking, the 4-T is what I use now (keep the silver oxides handy).
I shudder at the thought of what question you're going to posit us with
next, Ray ;^)
-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Moth [mailto:ray_moth@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 8:41 PM
To: Olympus Mailing List
Subject: [OM] If you had to choose only ONE body . . .
Dear All,
I'm posting this question to the list because a few people have hinted
at it:
"If you had to choose only ONE M/OM body for all your 35mm photography,
which would it be?"
This can mean any full-frame 35mm Olympus SLR body, including M-1,
OM-1, 1MD, 1n, 2, 2n, 2S, 3, 3Ti, 4, 4T(i), 10, 10QD, 10FC, 20(G),
30(F), 40(PC), 2000. (This may look like a formiddable list of models
but I personally find the Oly range a heck of a lot more logical that
the C*nt*x range!)
Regards,
=====
Ray
"The trouble with resisting temptation is
you never know when you'll get another chance!"
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|