Tom or anyone -
Can anyone tell me how the lower cost scanners like the Acer or Minolta
or ? compare to getting a Picture CD done by Kodak?
At $8 a pop the money adds up on the picture CD's and I think the
quality is so-so.
I can see spending $300-400 ( or a bit more...) on a scanner if I can
get better quality than the Picture CD's
--
Jim
Tom Scales wrote:
>
> I suppose 'every one' is too flip. I have several dozen 13x19 prints
> hanging around the house. Some are crisper than others, but all look great.
> The macro shots from the 90/2 (my flower shots) look particularly great.
>
> Tom
>
> > In a message dated 9/24/00 7:18:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> >
> > > One last point. I thought I only wanted 8x10, but then I bought a 13x19
> > > capable printer (Epson 1270) and a 2700dpi scanner isn't enough.
> > >
> > > Good luck,
> > >
> > > Tom
> >
> > Could I query as to how often you can get a sharp looking 13x19 out of our
> > Zuikos with the Polaroid? It is time to upgrade my PhotoSmart (at least
> from
> > the point of view of shadow noise) but to what end?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Warren
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|