Subject: | Re: [OM] Re Infrared images |
---|---|
From: | Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 24 Sep 2000 08:58:04 -0700 |
Doris Fang quoted, wrote: On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Jan Steinman wrote:This is not something you can do with standard 35mm technology. So-called "infrared film" is really only sensitive to what is called near-infrared, which would be many hundreds of degrees hot.Normal IR film can tell the difference between the heat radiating from a plant and that of the stone behind it. It can tell the difference between temps from someone's lips as opposed to their cheeks, Jan. I'd like to respectfully disagree, Doris. I believe such effects are due entirely to *reflected* IR. I'd challenge you to take such photos in complete darkness. -- : Jan Steinman <mailto:Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : Bytesmiths <http://www.bytesmiths.com> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM Zeiss, Richard Schaetzl |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Tamron Adaptall patch, Gary Edwards |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re Infrared images, *- DORIS FANG -* |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re Infrared images, *- DORIS FANG -* |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |