Deepest and most effulgent salutations to the numerous denizens of this
congregation whom saw fit to assist rather than engulf this miserable
novice in the flames of perdition for uttering a question so
awe-inspiringly bog-mindling in its ingenuousness that many may have rent
their garments, declaiming, "Get thee to the archives, thou worm!"
Flame, sirrah - why I would deem it an honour to converse with thee in
period of thy choice! Name it sire - Middle English, Medieval,
Elizabethan.....
Thy most humble and obedient servant
Andrew
>Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I noticed someone refer to a 30 second battery check test - I think in
>relation to OM2S/3/4. What is this - can someone enlighten me.
>==================================================================
>It was in relation to the OM-4, which first saweth the light of day in
>1985 A.D. There came about more recent models of the OM-4 which mayeth
>or mayeth not have been upgraded to use the beloved lower-current-drain
>OM-4T(i) circuitry. Thou mayst see if thy OM-4 hath been upgraded:
>holdest thou the switch in the 'battery test' position for a little
>more than 30 seconds. If it stoppeth its accursed beeping before thou
>hast released the switch, it hath verily been upgraded; if not, it hath
>not and there is no health in it. This doth not apply to the 2s nor, as
>far as I know (sorry, that should be AFAIK -gotta get the hang of this
>InterSpeak!), to the 3.
>
>
>Regards, Ray
>
>P.S. Should my use of Englishe seem a little dated, bearest thou in
>mynde that I penned this missive in the days of yore. Flamest thou not,
>lest the greater flaming be done unto thee!
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|