Subject: | Re: [OM] Tamron 80-200 f2.8 thanks! (+ Q on 180/2.5) |
---|---|
From: | Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Sep 2000 21:21:50 -0700 |
Hi Mike: << With the [Tamron SP] 80-200/2.8 I don't really see a need to carry a prime in that range any longer. >> Yup, I agree with you. Only if one HAS to reduce bulk or weight does an alternative need to be considered. It is THAT GOOD. Gary Reese Las Vegas, NV < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Kodak T400CN, Barry B. Bean |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 24/2.8 v.s. 28/2.8 (Follow-up), Barry B. Bean |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-4 and TTL Cords + Bomb in Jakarta [OT] (long . . . sorry!), Ray Moth |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Tamron 80-200 f2.8 thanks! (+ Q on 180/2.5), Motor Sport Visions Photography |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |