On Sat, 2 Sep 2000 18:13:05 -0600, Chris O'Neill wrote:
>- Does anyone who owns both of these lenses wish to confirm (or refute)
>my general impressions?
Absolutely. I've owned both for a while. Be happy to. The short
version is that in my experience, they are close enough performers
that I make my choice by focal length and not by quality.
>- Is the wider angle of view of the 24mm "worth" losing the additional
>stop (f22) that I currently have on the 28mm lens?
I hardly ever shoot anything above f/16 as it is, and both lenses
have depth of field to spare, so that's normally not an issue. I
suppose if I was shooting 3200 film at noon on a bright day with no
shade, it'd be a concern, but I seldom do that.
>- Most of my wide-angle shots have been outdoors, but I do
>occassionally take indoor shots. Is there a "best use" for each of these
>lenses?
I don't think so.
>- I have "dickered" the salesperson down to trading me the 24mm for my
>28mm and CDN$50 (about US$34 at the moment). Would folks
>consider this a "good" deal?
>
>Aw, hell! Maybe I just just buy it outright and have both???? (Grin!)
THERE'S the ticket!!!
FWIW, I keep a good wide angle arsenal in my bag. I own the 16, 21,
24, 28, and a Kenko fisheye adaptor that gives me 8mm with my 50. As
a general rule, I always carry the 21 and the 28, although the 24 was
a favorite for a long time. You won't be unhappy with either lens, so
why not get both and see what suits your shooting style best?
BBB
-
B.B. Bean bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bean & Bean Cotton Co/Bean Farms http://www.beancotton.com
Peach Orchard, MO
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|