So that 'splains why some pages take f-o-r-e-v-e-r to load. Yuk. Anyhum, I
haven't used thumbnails on my pages yet. Probably won't either. Seems
easier to just keep the images to a few worth looking at and rotate 'em
around now and then.
Lex
===
From: Acer V <siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OM] Photo Catalog Programs
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 17:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
>>>I don't create thumbnails of my images. Instead, I use the "width" and
"height" parameters in the HTML "img" tage to define a thumbnail size.
Saves a bit of disk space, and I find it easier to do it that way. Of
course, YMMV.<<<
isn't the whole point of theumbnails to load like fire, quickly, so that
the viewer cna chose which one he wants to see fullsize? if you use the
img tags to change (reduce) the dimensions, you're still loading the full
large file, taking forever for all but those with broadband....
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|