Hey, Mike,
As the unofficial, self-appointed travel director for the OM list, may I
suggest the following for your upcoming trip to Fort Worth...
;^)
Seriously, tho', as a sometime hunter myself (haven't tried bowhunting yet
tho'), I'd want to keep it light. Whether you need a tele in the 200 or 300
range depends on whether you'll be stalking or working from a stand.
Kiron lenses generally are well regarded, but it's best to stick with what
you're familiar with unless there's time to test those lenses before your
trip.
Being a minimalist I'd tend to choose the 24/2.8 for scenics, the 50/1.4 for
low light and all 'round stuff, and the Viv Ser-1 70-210 for wildlife stuff.
Or, I might choose the 300 or 400 and leave the zoom behind. Sure, it may
limit framing, but imagine the possibilities for dramatic shots. If I was
comfortable with the reliability of the camera I'd take just one body, and
maybe a P&S as a backup. But that's just me.
The main thing is the experience of being there. Enjoy and bring back some
pix.
Lex
===
From: "mike m." <"mnmitch"@bellsouth.net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [OM] Kentucky for Lex
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:22:05 -0400
I'll be heading to Idaho in a month or so for a 10 day Elk
hunting trip and need advice on a light travel kit. Considering that
I'll be climbing up and down mountains all day with my bow and arrows
and backpack, lightweight is essential.
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|