At 01:36 AM 8/20/2000 EDT, you wrote:
>In a message dated 8/18/00 9:41:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>> Film's cheap, and you only pay processing for the exposed film. I'm
>> always amazed at the lengths people will go to to "finish" a roll of
>> film.
>>
>> BBB
>
>I keep saying this to people who shun the Pentax 645 because it does not
have
>interchangeable backs. My answer is just to waste the rest of the roll,
>losing an average of 7 shots. The cost of this is just a few bucks. You
>could "waste" one half of a hundred to two hundred rolls of film for the
cost
>of a Hassy A12 back. As a practical matter you would never be changing film
>types (slides, prints, or B&W) that often.
>
>Warren
I know, I know, I know. But I just can't stand it.
Joel (planning shot #38) Wilcox
Iowa City, Iowa USA
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|