Subject: | Re: [OM] Reflections on multi-coating reflections - was Re: Flatirons and OM's |
---|---|
From: | "Lex Jenkins" <lexjenkins@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 19 Aug 2000 19:17:56 GMT |
Heck, tiny apertures are fuzzy with pinhole cameras. Just the nature of the
beast. Their strength is the unique image quality. And the world's most
affordable entry to MF and LF photography.
Lex === From: "Tom Trottier" <TomATrottier@xxxxxxxx>Subject: Re: [OM] Reflections on multi-coating reflections - was Re: Flatirons and OM'sDate: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 12:33:19 -0400 At Thursday, August 17, 2000 18:50, Lex Jenkins <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> spoke about *Re: [OM] Reflections on multi-coati...* saying> Personally, I think the best lens for UV photography is a pinhole camera.> Why spend money on special optics when air is free? But large apertures are a little fuzzy. Quite a disappointment when shorter wavelengths should be sharper. Tom ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] New PM-additions to the e-SIF, Hans van Veluwen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Print Films, Chris O'Neill |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Reflections on multi-coating reflections - was Re: Flatirons and OM's, Chip Stratton |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Marginally OT, Timpe, Jim |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |