Subject: | Re: [OM] Re: Zuikodependents |
---|---|
From: | "Lex Jenkins" <lexjenkins@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 04 Aug 2000 01:04:42 GMT |
Perhaps Zuikoholism, like insanity, is hereditary - you get it from your
kids.
And don't think of their photos as out of focus - consider it an exploration of bokeh. Lex === From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [OM] Re: Zuikodependents Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:06:54 -0500 All I know is that the disease may very well be genetic. Now when I go out for a walk with a camera, my two daughters come along (ages 7 and 8). Theyeach have an OM-G around their neck with an interesting lens attached to it.Last time, one had the 90/2 macro and the other had the 35/2.8. Halfway through the walk they switched. Of course, they got the lecture 'those lenses are expensive, be careful'. They're still not perfect on the concept of focusing, so I tend to put in fast film and set a small aperture, that way the depth of field helps them. So, I have a problem with Zuikodependence and so do my Zuikodependents! Wait, I guess it just might be environment....hmm....both my daughters are adopted. Tom ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] ADITL 4, John A. Lind |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] What lens to carry (again), Harridge, Wayne |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: Zuikodependents, Lex Jenkins |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: Zuikodependents, DAVDOU9211 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |