All I know is that the disease may very well be genetic. Now when I go out
for a walk with a camera, my two daughters come along (ages 7 and 8). They
each have an OM-G around their neck with an interesting lens attached to it.
Last time, one had the 90/2 macro and the other had the 35/2.8. Halfway
through the walk they switched. Of course, they got the lecture 'those
lenses are expensive, be careful'.
They're still not perfect on the concept of focusing, so I tend to put in
fast film and set a small aperture, that way the depth of field helps them.
So, I have a problem with Zuikodependence and so do my Zuikodependents!
Wait, I guess it just might be environment....hmm....both my daughters are
adopted.
Tom
> Tom (and others) -- Shouldn't this be Zuikodependence rather than
> Zuikodependents (unless you are selling your children into slavery to
> support your habit!) :-)
>
> That is -- one (apparently many on this list) is Zuikodependant -- the
> disease is Zuikodependance.
>
> Craig
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|