I think you will find that the SC Zuiko Zoom lenses are not marked with a
leading letter to indicate the number of lens elements as the SC primes
were. Those that were MC early on were marked "MC" until Olympus
eventually dropped use of the "MC" marking. You may also find some zooms
marked "S Zuiko" indicating they were an "economy" lens targeted to the
lower end of the market.
"Seeing green" is not an absolute indicator of MC either.
Among the zooms, I know the following were either MC at the outset or
became MC at some point:
35-70 f/3.6
35-105 f/3.5~4.5
85-250 f/5
I believe, but am not certain, the 65-200 also was or went MC. Of course,
the 35-80 f/2.8 has always been MC. I would be greatly surprised to see an
MC example of the 75-150/4. It and the 28/3.5 were heavily targeted in
Oly's marketing for the OM-10 (and its successor) buyer/user.
-- John
At 15:12 7/30/00 , Lex Jenkins wrote:
>Yikes! The Holy Grail of Zuikos! A multi-coated 75-150/4. Stop the
>presses, call out the National Guard, frizzen the mizzenmast, hoist my
>petard!
>
>How much did they want?
>
>Lex
>===
>>From: John Hudson <xyyc@xxxxxxxx>
>good trade?
>>Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 06:19:54 -0700
>>
>>Lex Jenkins wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I love the size and feel of the 75-150/4 (all reportedly were single
>>coated,
>> > BTW), and don't need more focal length if it means more size and weight.
>> In
>> > contrast and resolution mine compares very favorably with the Zuiko
>>50/1.8
>> > SC. Images are crisp and free of flare in tricky lighting situations.
>> >
>>
>>I saw a new in the box 75 / 150 / 4 a couple of weeks ago. The front
>>ring had no leading or trailing letter with "Zuiko" and the glass
>>reflected green.
>>
>>jh
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|