Hi Simon,
These pictures are taken on kodachrome 64.
The technical data of the pictures is given on the main pages.
However, it is tricky to compare the colours of the original slides with the
scanned images.
Nevertheless kodachrome gives the most natural colours of all common colour
films. Sometimes, this can be boring...
Compare for example an Ektachrome 100 image from 1990:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/photovoogt/pix/toba.html
And an Kodacolor Gold 100 image from 1998 (scanned from the negative):
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/photovoogt/holland/maki.html
Theses images have more saturated colours. Sometimes great, but not always
very natural... It is a matter of taste.
Bye,
Erwin.
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon E [mailto:ruralwales@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 9:04 AM
To: erwin.voogt@xxxxxx
Subject: Erwin's images, was [OM] Quality of Zuiko single coated 50/1.4
Erwin,
I was very taken with the colour 'signature' of these two shots,
particularly the one of the child, taken with the 35mm f2. What film did you
use?
Thanks,
Simon E.
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|