You might also find a varimagni and a flashlight useful for focus,
assuming a tripod, and the 24/2 or 35/2 for confined spaces.
All the 2- screens are a stop or so brighter than 1-
I think the OM2n has a longer max exposure time than the 4.
Tom
At 2000 July 11 - Tuesday 11:45, Pauls0627@xxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
spoke about *Re: [OM] questions...* saying
> In a message dated 07/11/2000 11:31:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> P.Dixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> > I shoot a lot of low-light stuff in badly lit tombs in eygpt with my
> > 50/1.4 on my om 4. Large (often wide-open) apps. being the norm, is
> > the 2-13 screen any better (ie. brighter) than the 1-13? If not , is
> > the beattie version good, and if so does anyone based in the uk know
> > a supplier?
>
> Welcome to the list, Peter!
>
> The 2-13 (and the 2-4) is significantly brighter than the 1-13. Supposedly
> the Beattie is as well. A worthwhile investement for anyone with an OM-2S,
> OM-3 or OM-4. The 2-x Oly screens are actually cheaper than the Beatties, too
> (but the Beatties have a grid, which may be useful for you in the kind of
> photography you do).
------------
Tom Trottier ICQ: 57647974 TomATrottier@xxxxxxxx
<<<<Abacurial Information Technology Consulting>>>>
400 Slater St. Suite 415, Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7S7
__o +1 613 291-1168 fax:594-5412 (877)247-8796
_ \< Vote for your favourite Olympus camera at
(+)/'(+) http://www.freevote.com/booth/fav_camera
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|