>On Thu, 06 Jul 2000 09:35:52 EDT, Dirk Wright wrote:
>
>> If
>>there was a famous relative at the wedding, and you took a picture of
>>him drunk and dancing with a 15 year year old, then sold the photo to
>>the Enquirer with a racy caption, then I think you'd be in deep
doodoo.
>
>My understanding (from working as a reporter, writer, and freelance
>photographer) is that journalists can shoot anyone anytime. On the
>other hand, sell that same picture on your website or in a gallery,
>and at the very least, you owe the famous relative a percentage.
>
I think the original question boils down to whether photographs from a
wedding are considered "editorial" or "commerical."
Be seeing you.
Dirk Wright
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|