The primary difference is longevity and the printer and consumables are much
more expensive. I can live with reprinting. Print quality is not supposed
to be dramatically different from the 1270.
Here's some English info:
http://www.epson.com/whatsnew/ygtsi/2000p.html
Tom
> :It looks interesting, but I'd spend the money on the Epson. I
> :have both the
> :Epson 1270 inkjet and the Alps MD-1300 Dye Sub. The Alps
> :produces wonderful
> :prints, but the Epson equals or surpasses it and prints up to
> :13x19. So,
> :unless the Oly printer is less than $400, which I doubt, I'd
> :go with the
> :Epson. I would bet the consumables on the Oly are high too.
> :They're very high on the Alps.
> :
> :I'm actually a convert. Nothing touched the Alps print quality
> :until this
> :generation of inkjet. I didn't think it could be equaled.
> :
> :My thoughts. Discard at will.
>
>
> Another interesting candidate for a new printer is the recently released
A3
> printer Stylus Photo 2000p. Prints are supposed to last 100 years.
> http://www.epson.nl/product/printer/styph2000p/
>
> (sorry - in Dutch; haven't found it in the .com or co.uk site yet)
>
>
> hnz
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|