-----Original Message-----
From: Martin <mgflink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: k.berry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <k.berry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, June 25, 2000 5:21 PM
Subject: Fw: [OM] 49mm Reverse Ring
>Hi Keith...Thanks for taking the time to reply to my question...I went to
>your web page, but unfortunately a good deal of it was double print making
>it very difficult to read especially the part that pertained to close-up
>work...I just hesitate to invest in another lens with macro
capability...For
>the few times I've needed a macro I've used an Olympus close-up lens 49mm
>f=40cm...I thought by using the reverse lens I'd get a brighter image with
a
>f1.8 rather than a f3.5 that macro opened up to (50mm f3.5)...Thanks again,
>Martin
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Keith Berry <k.berry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Sunday, June 25, 2000 4:32 PM
>Subject: Re: [OM] 49mm Reverse Ring
>
>
>>
>>Martin <mgflink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>Your thoughts on using a OM reverse ring with 50mm in lieu of a macro for
>>close-up use?? MG
>>
>>
>>There's a bit about that on my website:
>>www.keithberry.telinco.co.uk/page6.htm
>>
>>Regards,
>>Keith Berry
>>(Birmingham, England)
>>k.berry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>>
>>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|