I'll give one good reason for not liking the OM-G, a sample of which I have:
The mirror slap is bone tingling! Seriously, of all the OM cameras I've used
the vibration transmitted to the hand on taking a picture is much higher
than the single digit OMs, or the OM-PC. I don't remember what the OM-10
felt like - it must be the same. I can't help but think that this vibration
can degrade the quality of even hand-held photographs.
Other than that one problem, I like the OM-G, and think it delivers great
value for the money. Could be this is a problem of my sample only, but the
mirror pads look OK and not deteriorated, so I don't know.
Chip Stratton
cstrat@xxxxxxxxx
>
> Honestly, I'd vote for the G in this situation for several reasons:
>
> - It's a poor man's 2, lacking some features but not too many
> - It's surprisingly strong for a plastic body
> - It's cheap if you're patient
>
> Worst case, you haven't lost much money. I recommend it as a
> backup body for
> anyone.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|