OK, I'll weigh in here.
The 40/2 is NOT worth the money.
I love the lens and would be hard pressed to part with it. It's so small and
light and wonderful.
Didn't help, did I?
Tom
> Skip Williams wrote:
>
> >Are you SURE you want the 40/2? Its definitely a collectors lens. Not
as
> >sharp as the 50/1.8 or 50/2 Macro.
>
> Yeah, you tell 'em Skip, that crummy 40 f2 isn't up to much ;-)
>
> >If you're looking for a shooter's lens, stick with the $30 50/1.8 or a
35/2.8.
>
> I use both these focal lengths more than anything else, and often wonder
if
> that tiny, elusive in-between one would be a great lens to have as a 'one
> and only'. If only... (sigh)
>
> Simon E.
>
>
> <
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|