Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Zuiko 75-150/4 and its Aftermarket Competitors

Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 75-150/4 and its Aftermarket Competitors
From: Gary Schloss <schloss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 01:17:52 -0700
Paul Connet wrote:

>Tom Scales writes:
>
>> I actually own both the Vivitar and the Zuiko.  They look, feel and
>> work very similarly.
>
>There are two versions of the 70-150 Vivitar. The earlier one is a
>two-touch zoom, and the later one is one-touch. [...] The matching
>2x multiplier was probably also made in two versions.
>
>I once did an informal side-by-side comparison of the Zuiko 75-150
>and the first Vivitar, and concluded that I liked the look of the
>Vivitar better. It also focused closer.

Paul is right about the 2 Vivitar versions, and the 1-touch version
takes 55mm filters, and is thus more convenient for OLY users.  Later
on, Kino who made these lenses for Vivitar came out with an incredibly
compact Kiron 70-150/f4 which is also 1-touch, but takes 52mm filters.
Still, that Kiron (if you can find it!) is a fine lens.

>Later on I discovered the Tamron one-touch 75-150 f3.5 CF Tele Macro,
>and I haven't used the other lenses since. The Tamron will focus to 1:3
>at 150mm and with it's 2x matched multiplier will focus to 1:1.5.

Indeed, the above Tamron is a fine lens, quite compact, and it takes
49mm filters, just like the Zuiko.  However, the more interesting
offering from same lensmaker is the now scarce Tamron SP 70-150 f2.8
SOFT FOCUS.  This is an early SP lens, so it's 2-touch, built like a
tank, and is therefore rather large and heavy.  It is also very pricey.
However, this zoom is fast, and it has a built-in soft-focus mechanism.
Takes 62mm filters.

Speaking of fast portrait zooms, do not forget the scarce but wonderful
Tokina AT-X 60-120 f2.8 (1-touch, 55m filters).  Both it and the Tamron SP
were quite expensive when new, sold poorly, and were quickly discontinued.
Now, they are cult items, and command top $$$'s.

A propos the 75-150 Zuiko: a sure sign of element separation, in the
absence of clearly visible glass defects and/or discernible signs of
impact damage (i.e. the lens was dropped), is when the lens no longer
behaves as a true zoom, i.e. when there's a significant shift of focus
while zooming.

Cheers,



/Gary Schloss.
schloss@xxxxxxxxxxx
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz