At 08:15 AM 5/17/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>On Mon, 15 May 2000 15:37:25 -0500, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
>>I'd love to know if the OM-3Ti can produce as sharp results as the OM-4Ti.
>
>Why wouldn't it (assuming the same lens)? I've always worked on the
>assumption that the glass controls image quality and the body only
>controls exposure.
>
>BBB
Come on Barry, where you been? ;-)
Because the OM-3Ti lacks a self-timer, and apparently an OM-4T/2S/OM2000 on
tripod with self-timer/MLU/aperture stopdown produces sharper results than
an OM-1 with MLU (which lacks aperture stopdown, etc.). This I infer from
Gary Reese's lens tests.
Joel Wilcox
Iowa City, Iowa USA
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|