May I ask a technicality?
I always understood the f number to refer to the ratio of the actual
scenery light intensity appearing inside a lens. Ex: f2 would let in
1/2 the light intensity. Ergo, wouldn't f < 1 imply that light
amplification was taking place.
Or am I the shame of the Oly list with my wrong understanding of the f
number... grin..
Konrad
Erwin Voogt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Konrad wrote:
> ------
> I'm sure you've all got 8mm/0.8f's ... they're round-shaped and they
> give you more light than's available in the scene... bulbs?...
>
> hehe...
>
> Konrad
> ------
>
> Well, I know some people who use 50 mm F0.75 (or something close to those
> specs) lenses from X-ray camera's to take astronomy snapshots. With such a
> lens and a ISO 1600 film you get nice colourful Milky Way pictures in
> seconds. The quality is not excellent, but the same holds for the Zuiko 50
> mm primes wide open. The F0.75 lenses are quit bulky and the back element is
> very close to the film, so to mount them on a reflex body requires a little
> modification: removing the mirror...
>
> Bye
>
> Erwin Voogt
> Utrecht, The Netherlands
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|