CT-18 was before my time, but my mom hasd used this film then. The
CT-18 slides look OK for colour slide film of that era, especialy if
compared with Ektachrome. Kodachrome 64 was a tad less grainy,
Kodachrome 25 much less but this film had half the sensitivity.
Ray Moth schrieb:
> I haven't used Agfa slide film since the early 1980s because I found it
> grainy beyond belief.
At the begin of the 80´s I used CT-100 and regarding grain there was no
difference to Ektachrome.
Later, with introducing of the Elite 100, Kodak had the edge in low-grain,
but I was still using AGFA because I had lot of problems with
colorcasts in Kodak slides.
> Man, was it graaaaiiinnnyyy!! With so much
> grain, I could've taken up chicken farming already! <G>
Must have been a different film I used. Which AGFA film did you use?
There are/were many AGFA slide films.
Interesting slide copy method sniped...
> But the really striking thing was the *grain* when the original was an
> Agfa slide. That, coupled with the colour shift and the lens's poor
> definition, made a head-and-shoulders portrait of my daughter look like
> a bowl of cornflakes!
Did you use AGFA RS1000 slide film? The fastest (ASA 1000) and grainiest
slide film (but practical all ASA 400 films are very grainy) I know.
Regards
Richard
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|