Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: AF IS lenses was Re: [OM] Photography in "public" places

Subject: Re: AF IS lenses was Re: [OM] Photography in "public" places
From: "Tom Trottier" <TomATrottier@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 01:51:22 -0400
Hi Simon,

George D Lepp wouldn't agree with you, but his photos don't seem too 
sharp in the size he shows...

http://www.leppphoto.com/PhotoProductEval/Lenses.html

Tom

At 2000 March 20 - Monday 22:14, sje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
spoke about *AF IS lenses was Re: [OM] Photograp...* saying

> Doris wrote:
> 
> >  I have to admit that this is one of the things that is driving me
> >towards Canon's (and now Nikon's) IS technology.
> 
> IS technology has its problems. Here is a slice from Robert Monaghan's page
> on the problems of autofocus, to be found at:
> http://www.smu.edu/~rmonagha/third/af.html 
...
-------------------------
Tom Trottier, Abacurial IT Consulting     ICQ: 57647974
400 Slater St.Suite 415, Ottawa Ontario Canada  K1R 7S7
    __o  <TomATrottier@xxxxxxxx> <TomATrottier@xxxxxxxxx>
 _ \<    +1 613 291-1168 fax:594-5412 (877)247-8796
(+)/'(+) Vote for your favourite Olympus camera at
         http://www.freevote.com/booth/fav_camera

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: AF IS lenses was Re: [OM] Photography in "public" places, Tom Trottier <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz