But, Warren.....
There is no "Z" in TAMRON!
Thanks for the recommendation!
John
----- Original Message -----
From: <WKato@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] alternative to Zuiko 35-80 f/2.8
> If $762 is too high for your taste, try out the Tamron 35-100/2.8.
Although
> a little rare, they go for about $300 in a Adpatall mount. If you compare
> the Photodo (or was it the Pop Photo) tests, they basically rate about the
> same in MTF testing. I've never touched a Zuiko 35-80/.28 with my
prehensile
> fingers so can't give a personal comparison but I'm quite happy with my
> Tamron.
>
> Warren
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|