Personally, I think the 1.2 is too expensive. I have one and will probably
sell it. The difference in price between a good 1.4 with a serial number >1M
and the 1.2 isn't justified in the difference in maximum aperture.
Tom
> "By hook or by crook" I'll get new lenses, though I'm very pleased with
the
> 1.8. A brand new 50mm f1.2 is a bit pricey for me right now (about
$450.00
> from B & H in New York), but a local dealer has a 1.4 he's selling for 90
> bucks. He claims it's "mint". It ain't. It's got two long but shallow
> scratches...er...I mean "cleaning marks" on the front element. Still...
>
> Do you think it'd be worthwhile (fairly priced), or should I save the
money
> toward the new-in-the-box 1.2?
>
>
> EGAD...it's happening! I'm getting Zuiko fever!
>
> Craig
> "in
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|