I'll probably do both. I took shots of the same event last year (my kids
are a year apart in school), but with my Kodak digital. They came out fine,
but it does a nice job at handling different light sources.
I'm leaning towards:
1) OM-4 with 100/2, Fuji Press 800
2) OM-2S with 35-105 and T32
I'll probably throw the 85/2 and the 180/2.8 in the bag too. Heck, if I'm
going to look like a camera geek, might as well do it with quality.
Tom
> Tom wrote:
>
> >
> > Hmm, food for thought. I'm not sure I agree with the crutch
> > part, but the
> > fast primes are awfully useful.
> >
> > Perhaps a compromise. I'm starting the think that the 800
> > would do ok. I
> > think I'll go with the 100/2 on one body and the 35-105 (just
> > got it) on
> > another.
> >
> > So many decisions.
> >
>
> Think about this one. What sort of lighting is in the building ? If it's
> tungsten the available light shots will be yellow/orange (unless you use a
> compensating filter) which doesn't look too bad, however if the lighting
is
> fluorescent the shots will probably have an overall green colour. The lab
> **could** compensate for this in the printing, but probably won't. Flash
> may be a safe bet for this situation, why not put a T32 on one body and
> compare the results ?
>
> Wayne Harridge
> Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|