I can't get to see the catalogue so what sort of detail level are you
talking about? I have some dragonfly shots where the hairs and
compound eyes are perfectly defined. I think the hairs would have to be
about the smallest features I can recall. I shall have to dig out the
slides again and have another shifty. Oh yes, were talking 90/2 for these
shots.
Giles
Matt BenDaniel wrote:
> Has anyone seen the Spring 2000 issue of The Nature Company Catalog? There is
> a fantastic full page shot of a
> dragonfly on the cover with detail that seems to go well beyond the limits of
> the reproduction format. Can an OM
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|