I agree with Giles on NPH over NPS.
The NPS did not impress me, but the NPH gave some 'punch' to the
images under 'dull' lighting from my experience.
However, since I'm always on budget, I use Superia (400) most of
time. I used these for the Disney trip two weeks ago along with
Velvia's.
Jim Terazawa
Giles wrote:
> Fuji NPS 160 is always touted as a portrait film. I have used it a couple
> of times and have not been won over by it. I much prefer, and would
> recommend, Fuji NPH 400 for portrait use though.
>
> Fuji Reala is my standard print film and if I was going to mix portrait
> and landscape use I would use that as it gives fine skin tone rendition
> IMO.
>
> Giles
>
> atk@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Hum this is an old (and boring topic for most) but do people have
> > recommendation on fine grain medium contrast natural colour print film
> > (for landscape/people shots). Also is Fuji Reala Superia the same as Fuji
> > Reala. I took a test roll of Reala Superia last weekend and am working on
> > a test roll of Kodak 160nc... Other than those two anything special that
> > should be tried ?
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|