Subject: | Re: [OM] scanning transparencies |
---|---|
From: | "Gettis John" <jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 14 Mar 2000 17:13:57 -0800 |
Check out the Canon 2710. I do not have one due to my wife thinking that paying bills and Children Eating is more important. I have been looking at it and while it is slightly more than the Olympus and the Hp it looks on paper to be worth it. John Gettis < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: [OT] Sticking with Film and Vinyl (was "OM toDigital"), John Hermanson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: Enough, was, [OT] Sticking with Film and Vinyl, J. Williams |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] scanning transparencies, Dave Bulger |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] scanning transparencies, Motor Sport Visions Photography |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |