Wayne, if no one has spoken for it, I would like to have your LowePro
Mini-Trekker. Send me an address and I'll send you a money order, $50 plus
some shipping.
Gary Edwards
Wayne Shumaker wrote:
> Doris, you are absolutely right. they are not good for working out of.
> I primarily use them to transport stuff. Plus I can throw a bunch of
> stuff in them, like spare batteries, cables, etc. More often than not
> they are used for storage or hauling my film scanner around.
>
> The bag I use the most is the Lowepro Photo Runner, sometimes two. Most
> of my shooting is outdoors. I have yet to find the right combination. I
> have two lowepro packs, which I haven't used much. (if anybody would
> like a lowepro mini trekker - $50 in new condition). Maybe when I start
> carrying around some bigger lenses I'll get around to using them.
>
> For transport, the cooler with FISH BAIT written on it maybe be the
> better deterrent.
>
> Wayne
>
> At 05:29 PM 3/7/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>
> <<<< The bag was called GateMouth. There was a sale at the time. It is a
> green and beige bag. What I do is pack a LowePro Photo Runner back
> inside the GateMouth Jr. bag.
> Wayne >>
>
> I noticed these at Home Despot a while back, and they seem very heavy,
> awkward to work out of, and in general inferior (though very sturdy)
> to most camera bags. Why would one "double-bag", save for transport via
> a vehicle ? A bag that is used for tools may be as desirable to a thief
> than one that says "camera".
> *= Doris Fang =*
> >>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|