Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Better Flash recs & handle mounted flash Q

Subject: Re: [OM] Better Flash recs & handle mounted flash Q
From: HI100@xxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 05:36:24 EST
This ( inverse square law) topic has already been pretty much beaten to death 
by others on the list but here are a few  more comments in a slightly 
different vein.

The T32 is very powerful for its size and angle of coverage. It is actually 
the same power as the much larger Handle mount Sunpak 544 (They are both 70J 
(W-sec) ). The higher GN of the 544 (140ft) just reflects the narrower angle 
of coverage (area.) This means with a suitable focusing system for longer 
lens use the T32 will do well against many common handle mount flashes like 
the 544. Unfortunately the Zoom focus head adapter for the T32 is not very 
efficient so the GN does not go up as much as might be expected from theory 
when used (set to 135mm) with a long lens   The downside for the T32 versus 
the 544 or 555 say is the longer recycle times especially with used cells 
since the 544 runs off 6 cells versus 4 for the T32. The 544 is also more 
versatile in available vairiable settings. On the other hand the BG2 /T32 
combination gives much improved recycle results with a similar size to the 
544 since it uses C cells.   

Wayne asked about other add on fresnel lens focusing systems for very high 
GN's  The Best I have seen in handle mount units is the Metz unit which is 
quite large but doubles the GN.  This means GN's of about 400ft for a lens 
coverage of 120mm focal length. Maybe this add on could be kluged to work 
with a T45 or even T32 ??
see http://www.metz.de/mecablitz/eng/produkte/zubehoer/Welcome.html     and 
look under accessories  section

Of the commonly available handle mount  units (without an added lens ) the 
Metz CT60-4 is one of the more powerful since it achieves a GN of around 
200ft but with an angle of coverage of  a 28mm lens, a big increase over the 
most powerful Sunpak Handle mount (622 pro) which is also 200ft but only for 
a 35mm coverage. The theoretical GN for the Metz CT60 if it covered 24mm is 
only 157ft versus the T45's  GN of about 147ft for 24mm coverage. Thus a T45 
with a well matched fresnel lens should be only slightly less powerful than 
the Metz with it's lens. Get your flashmeter and experiment with some plastic 
fresnel lenses!

John Hermanson has previously posted that the T45 is just two T32 circuits 
with two flash tubes in a single housing with a single reflector. This means 
this handle mount unit is a respectable 140J unit.

One of the simplest options would be to use two T32's as has been suggested 
but with two OM clip on zoom heads. This is probably one of the least 
expensive ways of achieving reasonable GN's with a light weight OM rig, as 
Barry had originally asked. Adding  a Quantum Bantam pack would help keep 
recycle times short without adding too much weight. You may have to line up 
the flashes carefully with the lens axis

An interesting site with trad flash tubes 
http://www.graflex.org/flash/meggaflash/
Here are some GN comparisons for flash bulbs: 
http://www.dhios.demon.co.uk/Flashbulbs/Bulbs1.htm
                and     http://www.graflex.org/flash/ge-5.html
Note some units get to GN 600ft+ without lens focussing ! And in a light 
weight package but of course no OTF control!

Quantum's excellent site has GN's for their studio flashes. 
http://www.qtm.com/

I previously posted more information to the list comparing GN's of T32's 
versus a niumber of popular flashes at different angles of coverage. This 
should be in the archives.

Regards,

              >> Tim Hughes <<

_hi100@xxxxxxx   (remove underscore to reply)

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz