Tom Scales wrote:
>
> These days, a good inkjet can produce prints close to as good as a dye
> sublimation printer. Dye sub is essentially a tape cartridge where the
> 'ink' is melted onto the paper. It goes through four passes, one for each of
> the colors (magenta, cyan and yellow) and one clear overcoat.
>
> For a good general purpose printer, if I had it to do over again, I'd buy
> one of the top of the line HP or Epson inkjet photo printers.
>
> As for scanners, there is no contest. A negative (or slide, they do both)
> scanner, in my opinion, is much better. You also don't have to actually
> produce prints, if you don't want.
>
> I'm no expert, these are just my opinions.
>
> Tom
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
I have to agree with most of this. (I like the Canon printers.)
The best flatbed scanner is only as good as the item being scanned. You
are at the mercy of the lab that printed the photo being scanned.
Bob
--
//////
( 0 0 )
-73 de Bob----o000---O---000o---W8IMO@xxxxxxxxxxx----------------
Living in the last year of the 20th Century and 2nd Millennium.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|