John
I tested the 90/2 + 1.7x IS-3 converter for Gary. The results are on
the site. Professional? I dunno. But it had mostly 'B's and the couple
of slides I took with it in Hawaii looked pretty darn good.
It fared **far** better than the 90 + Zuiko 2X combo. And it's about 1
1/3 stops faster. I wish I had never modified my 90 to mate with the 2X,
and I would recommend against anyone doing it.
George
"John A. Prosper" wrote:
>
> For those of you who have used the 90/2 or 100/2 with the B-300
> "teleconverter", is this a professionally sharp combo?
>
> How about using the IS3 0.8X wide angle converter with the 35/2? with
> the 24/2? with the 21/2? Is there vignetting with the 24/2 or 21/2?
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|