On 7 Feb 2000 atk@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
|Hello -- I have a couple questions about Gary rating of lenses.
|
|Second, in general how do you compare the 85mm, 90mm and 100mm f2, 100mm f2.8.
|Hum -- what I mean is that in addition to raw rating do you see much difference
|between these lenses in quality of picture ? (Also if the camera is hand held
|would the rating between these lenses be much different)?
I'll take this one. I feel that lenses should be tested at their
optimum image quality setting. For the 85/2 and 100/2, this setting
is infinity. For the 90/2 macro, it's 1:10 lifesize.
This way the great subplot about: who's sharper---the 90/2 or the
100/2 can be finally resolved to every one's satistfaction.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|