In a message dated 02/03/2000 5:33:06 PM Eastern Standard Time,
RBeckric@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> OK troops. New guy needs some help.
Welcome to the list!
>
> Actually tried to do my homework before exposing my ignorance to the list.
> I checked the FAQ's, surveyed the List archives, surfed the web... and
still
> don't know:
>
> Which is the better use of limited photo dollars - a OM 2000 (new) or a
OM-
> 1 (used)?
>
> I currently own OM-1 MD's and lenses (and Pen FT* since the 60's), but
know
> nothing
>
> of the OM2000 (only what I could find and read... which mostly sounded
like
> press releases
>
> or "pontificator du jour" rather than users). Did note both cameras seem
to
> be running about
>
> the same in price. If it's been covered, will someone please direct me; if
> not, opinions please.
Seeing how you already have OM-1s, you could look at this two ways. By buying
another OM-1 (I would strongly recommend an OM-1n over an OM-1MD), you will
have identical user interfaces on all your cameras. On the other hand, an
OM2000 will give you some additional capabilities (spot metering, 1/125 sec
flash synch and easy double exposures). The OM2000 will also have a warranty.
You may not like the feel of the OM2000, either. They are very light and
"plasticy" Find a place that has an OM2000 in stock and see if you like the
way it feels.
Paul Schings
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|