Here's how, Gary..... Get yer 8 mm, lots of Grand Canyon maps, a jar of paste,
and head for the nearest Omnimax Dome......
Gary Edwards <g>
"John A. Lind" wrote:
> At 18:13 1/29/00 , Gary Reese wrote:
> >I'm pondering what to do about that one. The subject magnification in a
> >fisheye is variable, depending on the distance from the center of the
> >frame and my evaluation methodology used with other Zuikos maybe
> >invalid here. The center looks GREAT, but is it PARTLY due to the
>
> Hmmm, I've wondered how one would test a fisheye. How are you going to get
> a flat map big enough for the 8mm <g>?
>
> More seriously, would a test method using the inside of a spherical
> surface, the radius of which is distance to the rear lens node (maybe one
> mapped to a flat plane) be more valid? If I understand it right, isn't
> that what a theoretical fisheye does? Map spherical surfaces in space to a
> flat one on the film? Like a polar projection (equidistant azimuthal) map
> maybe?
>
> Just some random thoughts.
>
> -- John
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|