Waaaal,
This Texas boy ain't too bright, so I've got to keep it simple.
The 100/2 gives me excellent results. The 24/2 gives me excellent results.
Since I'm lucky enough to be able to shoot exclusively for my own
pleasure, this is all I need.
The heck with the numbers, Zuiks! It's the photographs that count!
Dave
On Thursday, January 27, 2000 6:30 PM, John A. Prosper
[SMTP:prosper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 Pauls0627@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> |In a message dated 01/27/2000 5:21:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> |geanders@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> |
> |> >OM 100/2 - 3.9
> |> >Canon 100/2 - 4.2
> |> >Minolta 100/2 - 4.4
> |> >Nikon 105/2.5 - 4.2
> |> >Leica Apo-Macro-Elmarit-R 100/2.8 - 4.5
> |> >
> |> >OM 90/2M - 4.2
> |> >Leica Summicron-M 90/2 - 4.3
> |> >Tokina AT-X 90/2.5 - 4.6
> |> >Tamron SP 90/2.5 - 4.2
> |> >Contax G Sonnar 90/2.8 - 4.4
> |
> |Geez, I hope the list doesn't get into an uproar over this one.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|