Subject: | Re: [OM] lens comparasons |
---|---|
From: | "george" <geanders@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 27 Jan 2000 13:43:58 -0800 |
>>From the photodo web site, comparable lenses followed by they photodo >grade: > >OM 100/2 - 3.9 >Canon 100/2 - 4.2 >Minolta 100/2 - 4.4 >Nikon 105/2.5 - 4.2 >Leica Apo-Macro-Elmarit-R 100/2.8 - 4.5 > >OM 90/2M - 4.2 >Leica Summicron-M 90/2 - 4.3 >Tokina AT-X 90/2.5 - 4.6 >Tamron SP 90/2.5 - 4.2 >Contax G Sonnar 90/2.8 - 4.4 > > This sucks! Anybody want to buy a POS Zuiko 90/2 macro? :>) george < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-4T(i) paint, Giles |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Black vs Chrome/Titanium WAS: OM-2S question, Dave Bulger |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] lens comparasons, Dirk Wright |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] lens comparasons, Barry B. Bean |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |