ML Archiv: Re: [OM] wide angles

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] wide angles

from Glen Lowry

Subject:	Re: [OM] wide angles
From:	Glen Lowry <lowry@xxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 08:36:34 -0800

Barks wrote:

[snip]
> That is what I have done: I now have a 21/3.5 complementing (note the
> 'e' BTW) my 28/2.8.    

Careful Chris, this is the kinda thing that gives us English
teachers/professors a bad name.

Glen

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] wide angles, Joseph RE: [OM] wide angles, Olaf Greve RE: [OM] wide angles, - DORIS FANG - Re: [OM] wide angles, george RE: [OM] wide angles, Barks Re: [OM] wide angles, John Pendley Re: [OM] wide angles, Glen Lowry <= Re: [OM] wide angles, Barks Re: [OM] wide angles, Gregg Iverson Re: [OM] wide angles, Ian A. Nichols Re: [OM] The King's/Queen's English, lclark Re: [OM] The King's/Queen's English, Barks Re: [OM] wide angles, george Re: [OM] wide angles, Barks Re: [OM] wide angles, Dirk and Carla Wright Re: [OM] wide angles (and terminology), Ian A. Nichols Re: [OM] wide angles, ALEXSCIFI

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] contact lenses instead of glasses??, Thomas Heide Clausen
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] wide angles, george
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] wide angles, John Pendley
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] wide angles, Barks
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]