Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Tamron Adaptall vs. Adaptall2 -Reply

Subject: Re: [OM] Tamron Adaptall vs. Adaptall2 -Reply
From: "Rand E." <rtomcala@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:24:47 -0500
I wouldn't trust any criteria other than checking each individual
adapter to my OM-4 body.  The effort is minimal and the potential damage
is costly.
Rand E.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Scott Nelson wrote:
> 
> If you do get a used adaptall II, make sure it is marked "OL" rather than "OM"
> and it will be he correct model for use with the OM 4T.
> 
> >You would be best off getting a new Tamron Adaptall 2 OM adapter.  I'd
> >pass on paying more than $31-34, least the retailer to get too high a
> >markup. If you buy a used one (typically in the low $20's), sight
> >unseen, you run the risk of getting an early model without offset
> >screws.  It will sheer off the rubber plug on the lens mount of the late
> >OM bodies.
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz