62mm is correct and I wish everyone would stop talking about the 35-70,
F2.8! I'm getting dangerously close to doing something really bad - buy it!
RonS
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of ALEXSCIFI@xxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2000 2:35 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] 35-80F2.8 filter thread?/was close focus quality?
In a message dated 2000-01-24 2:00:54 PM Eastern Standard Time,
prosper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<<
Alternatively, if you doneed the zoom, be advised that the 35-80/2.8's
62mm filter size is a perfect match for Nikon'shigh quality 5T (+1.5)
& 6T (+2.9) acromat diopters.
>>
Are you sure it's 62mm? I thought the 35-80F2.8 had 72mm filters!
Alex
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|