Subject: | Re: [OM] 35mm Film Format [was: OT Leica, Contax, and Olympus [was: OWCH! That hurt my ear]] |
---|---|
From: | "Charles Loeven" <cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 16 Jan 2000 21:23:37 -0800 |
===You're right about 8x10 or any other standard print size 5x7 or larger, and you'd have to ask Oskar why not 24x30mm. MF 6x4.5cm is a lot closer to the larger print aspect ratios.==== My question would be "why 8x10 and not a more proportionate size print for the film"? Is it because Arron bros. sells mostly 8x10 frames? <GG> CL < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Need for Circular Polarizer?, Charles Loeven |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Depth of Field with Long Teles / Need advice on long tele-lens for OM4, Buddy Walters |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1352, Gary Reese |
Next by Thread: | [OM] [OT] History: 8x10 Format, John A. Lind |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |