On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 04:01:56PM +0100, Olaf Greve wrote:
> Uhhhh, maybe a stupid question (and I haven't really been following this
> thread anyway), but why would you want to undergo the torture of having _3_
> versions of Windows running on your machine?!? Especially since you have NT
> on there, at least 98 becomes superfluous, as it's much crappier than NT.
There are programs out there that insist on XCV or XCV++ and won't run on
NT, or even Win2K. Most of them are games, but if that's what you want to
do...
> Hee, hee, here I was thinking Oly items were already a peculiar choice for
> collections, but when one starts collecting Operating Systems (OSes)...:)
http://jmaynard.home.texas.net/homebox.html
I solved the problem not by dual- (or triple-) booting, but by building up
additional systems...makes life simpler.
(If XCV doesn't make sense to you, decode it as Roman numerals.)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|