Actually, the point is a review, not neccesarrily the best, wins. At
least that's what their current contest adds up to. If it were the best
review, what incentive would anyone have to "enter"?
Erik Stiegler
On Sat, 1 Jan 2000, Jim Mueller wrote:
> What a joke! I've been submitting reviews for various photo equipment at
> http://www.PhotographyREVIEW.com/ for a couple of months. I even wrote
> one on the OM-1 just for fun.
>
> I've also been reading some extremely well written reviews by others.
> There were many professional quality reviews written by people who knew
> what they were talking about. Some of those reviews simply blew mine
> away!
>
> The whole point to this contest was that the best review wins a
> photo-vest. I figured my chances of winning were one in a million
> anyway; but I DID expect the winning review to be of VERY high quality.
>
> Well, guess what? The winning review and author were posted today. The
> winning review is below, complete with spelling and grammatical errors.
> This is a direct copy and paste.. WHAT A JOKE!!
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|