Hi all,
George pretty well summed up the article, but if someone would like a copy
for their web page for all to see, I can scan a copy of a (copy / not
original) I picked up from a camera store lately. I'll need a couple of
days, wife has me tied up with honey dos this weekend.
Buddy Walters
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of GMA
Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 7:38 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Let's find this article!
DB et al;
I don't have an electronic copy of the article, but here's a copy of my
original message sent on Oct 16 describing what I read. Hope this
helps. I believe it was in the Nov/Dec issue, 1999.
George
************************************************************************
Zuiks;
Well, the much-awaited article in Photo Techniques by Mike Johnston just
arrived at my door. The title is "Great Zuikos". It's a follow-up to
the article a couple months ago describing the OM System as
"Photographys' Best-Kept secret." This one is a 1 1/2 page article
describing some Zuikos which are "...if anything, even better kept
secrets than the [OM] cameras."
He begins with the 'bad news': Zuikos are less consistent than other
lens systems (because they are not divided into 'pro' and 'consumer'
categories); some Zuikos available today are only average; biggest
problem area for older and used Zuikos is *coating*: early slow lenses
and early versions of std lenses are SC and suffer from more flare than
todays' photographers are used to.
But I love this quote: "... the very best Zuikos meet or in some cases
even surpass the performance of far better-known lenses."
His "Short List":
21/2 and 21/3.5 (his sole error in the article is he ids the slow one
as 21/2.8)
24/2 Says this one gets mixed reviews, but he's "a big fan"
24/3.5 shift "truly awesome piece of glass"
50/2 macro. He raves about it. "Better than current Summicron-M."
"Superbly sharp and contrasty."
90/2 and 100/2 The 90 is "on par with Zeiss and Leica long macros - best
available" THen says the 100 is "better still"! Insists all OMers should
have one or the other of these lenses.
35-80/2.8 "sharpest in it's class"
180/2 or 250/2
Special award to his (and Sally Manns') "sentimental favorite": 40/2.
Finally he asks Olympus to do a small run of this "legendary optic" as a
present to the OM faithful!!!
Way to go, Mike. And hey, Olympus, if you're listening, how about an
80-200/2.8 as a mate to the 35-80?
Oh, and our own Gary Reeses' lens test page is mentioned as a resource.
Thanks, Mike, for a great pair of articles on a fine collection of
camera gear: the OM System.
George
************************************************************************
Dogbreath wrote:
>
> If anyone has a (electronic) copy of this article ranking Zuikos, please
> share it!
>
> Thanks.
>
> DB
>
> >From: GMA <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Re: [OM] Good OM Site
> >
> >Michael;
> >
> >Hadn't seen the site, but this is the magazine article that's been
> >mentioned on the list. There is another article, a month or two later,
> >which lists top ten Zuikos.
> >
> >George
> >
> >Michael O'Carrigan wrote:
> >>
> >> Has anyone noticed this site yet?
> >>
> >> http://www.phototechmag.com/previous-articles/jul-dubler99.htm
> >>
> >> A great site for lovers of OM cameras and Zuiko lenses.
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|