Hi lafish,
You could also consider the Kiron Varifocal lens - quite sharp, tho
heavy.
Tom
On 10 Dec 99, at 9:30, lafish <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> spoke about "[OM]
considering 35-105 zuiko," saying
> I'm considering buying a 35-105; that range of moderate wide angle to
> portrait would cover 98 percent of what I do.
> What are people's thoughts on this lens?
> I have an OM-1 and OM-2, 28 3.5, 50 1.8 and 75-150, all circa 20 years old.
> I'd like to stay with the OM system, but
> would also like some more modern glass.
> Larry Fisher
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
-----------------
From:Tom Trottier, 400 Slater St. Suite 415,Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7S7
__o Tom@xxxxxx (or TomTrottier@xxxxxxxxxxx if problems)
_ \< Voice: +1 613 291-1168 fax: 594-5412 No ads, please
(*)/'(*) "Make it as simple as possible, but no simpler" - Einstein
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|