Subject: | [OM] 55/1.2 or 50/1.2 |
---|---|
From: | "RK" <rk1@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 13 Dec 1999 22:18:43 +0530 |
Just thought I'd use the list's collective wisdom: Is the 50/1.2 really vastly superior to the 55/1.2? If so, how? I have the 55/1.2 and am being offered the 50/1.2 at a not-completely-outrageous price; should I snap? What is the usual price for a lens in 9+ condition? Thanks, RK < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Greenish viewfinder image - is this unusual?, earthlink |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Think twice if you like the 16mm focal length, Kurt Hurley |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus Retro-zoom, Pauls0627 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 55/1.2 or 50/1.2, Skip Williams |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |